Legal Opinion

Paciga v. Property Tax Appeal Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 2001No. 2 — 00—0177, 2 — 00—0178 consPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

The defendants, the Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board (PTAB) and the De Kalb County Board of Review (De Kalb Board), appeal the order of the trial court reversing the PTAB’s decision upholding the reassessment of the property of the plaintiff, Frank E. Paciga. This court consolidated the defendants’ separate appeals. We affirm.

Prior to 1997, Paciga’s property, 23.59 acres in Kingston, De Kalb County, Illinois, was assessed as farmland. More specifically, 3.15 acres of the parcel were assessed as “cropland” because they had been farmed in 1995, 1996, and 1997, and the remaining 20.40 acres…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paris v. FederIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McMahan v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McNamee v. Federated Equipment & Supply Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harvel v. City of Johnston CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lieb v. Judges' Retirement SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rolando v. PenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. People v. ISUNZAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. People v. MalinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Dundee Township v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API