Menenberg v. CARL R. SAMS REALTY CO. INC.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.
Plaintiff Jack H. Menenberg, a certified public accountant and attorney-at-law, was. an accountant for the Felsot Building Company in 1949. He occupied an office which he rented from George F. Curran, an attorney for Carl R. Sams Company. This company, a copartnership consisting of Carl R. Sams, Charles J. Merrill and Paul Threm, was engaged in the real estate brokerage business.
Sams and Menenberg discussed the possibility of an agreement to sell property for Felsot. Sams proposed that, if such an arrangement could be made, the company would compensate Menenberg for his services in connection…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Egner v. States Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Wheaton v. Cadillac Automobile Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Larson v. NewmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- W. H. Barber Agency Co. v. Co-operative Barrel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Poppe v. BowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Monohon v. Smith & Loveless Division, Union Tank Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972