Legal Opinion

Poppe v. Bowler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1931No. 28,584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In this action to recover damages for fraud and deceit in a real estate deal, plaintiff was by the judgment awarded $6,000 against appellants and defendant Swansen. Appellants’ motion for a new trial was denied, and the judgment entered from which they appeal.

The appellants, husband and wife, as joint tenants, owned two lots on Como avenue and Twenty-second street southeast, Minneapolis, subject to tAvo mortgages; one of $11,000, upon which on June 5, 1925, there was $9,772.04 unpaid, and one of $2,000 was of record unsatisfied until after the transaction presently to be stated.

On the lots…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Groscup v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. W. H. Barber Agency Co. v. Co-operative Barrel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Floyd v. MackeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Bromley v. AdaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egner v. States Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Menenberg v. CARL R. SAMS REALTY CO. INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API