Legal Opinion

Monohon v. Smith & Loveless Division, Union Tank Car Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 2, 1972No. Civ. A. 29763PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Paul J. Monohon, instituted this suit in the Circuit Court for Oakland County, Michigan. It was removed to this court upon petition by defendant, the Smith & Loveless Division of the Union Tank Car Company (hereinafter referred to as “S & L”). Monohon contends that S & L tortiously interfered with plaintiff’s “personal fiduciary business relations” with one James E. Foyle. More specifically, Monohon contends that S & L induced Foyle to violate fiduciary duties owed by Foyle to Monohon.

Since this case was removed to this court on the grounds of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Bahr v. Miller Brothers CreameryMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bay City-Abrahams Bros., Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc. v. Fleurop-InterfloraDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API