Legal Opinion
Metivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P.J.
This is an action under the “Comprehensive” coverage of a Massachusetts automobile policy issued by defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”) to plaintiffs Julie Ann Metivier and Robert J. Metivier, husband and wife, on their 1988 Ford Taurus station wagon. The Comprehensive section of the policy insured against “direct and accidental damage to your auto other than damage caused by collision.”
On August 2,1993, Julie Metivier reported to the Lowell Police that the car had been stolen. A few hours later, the Lowell Police recovered the car from the Merrimack River in Lowell. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Jacobs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Vigeant v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
- North Shore Chiropractic v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Boehm v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
- Taylor v. Hingham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Nealon v. JohnsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013