Russell v. Lund
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSher.bur.ne, J.
This is an action of replevin brought under the provisions of P. L. 1910. The writ was served by the sheriff, and he certified in his return that the value of the property replevied was sixty dollars, and returned the writ to the Essex Municipal Court. The defendant appeared specially and seasonably moved to dismiss upon the grounds hereinafter mentioned. A hearing was held upon this motion 14 days after the return date, and at a much later date the motion to dismiss was granted, and judgment was entered dismissing the action, ordering the return of the property and awarding damages and costs…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- State Highway Board v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- In Re Swanton Market AreaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- Dunshee v. StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1826
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GoyetSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- In Re Estate of WatkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Midlantic National Bank North, N.A. v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990
- Ratepayers Coalition of Rochester v. Rochester Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Kerwin-WhiteUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.