Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Watkins

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1944PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

After the opinion was handed down in the case of In re Estate of Watkins, 113 Vt 126, 30 A2d 305, holding that the Howard National Bank and Trust Company (hereinafter called the Bank) did not by virtue of its consolidation with the City Trust Company succeed the latter as executor of the Watkins estate, the Bank petitioned the probate court to be appointed administrator, d.b.n., c.t.a. of that estate. This petition was opposed by those entitled to take under the Watkins will, hereinafter called the beneficiaries, who asked for the appointment of the Rutland Trust Company, or some other…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Ex Parte Worcester County National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Nelson v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  4. Putney v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Comstock v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tupelo Redevelopment Agency v. Gray Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sargent v. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  3. Ricci v. Bove's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  4. Brookside Memorials, Inc. v. Barre CitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Clary v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API