Ford v. Harden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
1. The rule is weli recognized that where evidence pertaining to the same cause of action is introduced without objection, but the evidence could have been authorized by an amendment to the pleadings, it is proper for the trial court to charge the jury on the issues thus made. Evans v. Henson, 73 Ga. App. 494 (2c), (37 S. E. 2d 164). This does not mean that evidence pertaining to a different cause of action will have the same effect, because a plaintiff must recover upon the cause of action declared upon and not upon another cause of action shown by the evidence to exist. Dixie Ornamental…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evans v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Thomas McDonald & Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- DIXIE ORNAMENTAL IRON COMPANY, INC. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Blackston v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farmers Warehouse of Pelham, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Beacon Industries, Inc. v. Vanderbunt Concrete, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Hayes v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Adair Realty Co. v. WellmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Venture Construction Co. v. Great American Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.