Legal Opinion

DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1955No. 35528PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

We agree with the trial judge that the petition did not, either before or after amendment, set out a cause of action. It is generally known that in the real estate business sometimes the seller is bound for the commission, and at other times the purchaser is bound, depending upon the contract between the seller and the broker.

In such a case as here the mere knowledge of the salesman that one was offering the property for sale would not imply that the owner was to receive less than the amount for which he offered his property for sale, and there is nothing in the record which would indicate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Kitchens v. PoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Douglas v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Meador v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Wright v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DL STOKES & CO., INC. v. McCoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Ford v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. D. L. Stokes & Co. v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API