N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Per curiam
The complainants sought certificates of convenience and necessity or permits before the Interstate Commerce Commission on the theory that on July 1, 1935, they were operating as ’ contract carriers by motor vehicles, within the meaning of the Motor Carrier Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 303, over the route for which application was made, and had so operated since that time.
The Commission denied the applications. The complainants filed separate suits in *468the District Court to set aside the orders of the Commission. The cases were heard by a Court composed of three judges under the Motor Carrier Act, 49…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- O'MALLEY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
- Lubetich v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1941
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941