Legal Opinion

N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 14, 1941No. Nos. 599, 601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The complainants sought certificates of convenience and necessity or permits before the Interstate Commerce Commission on the theory that on July 1, 1935, they were operating as ’ contract carriers by motor vehicles, within the meaning of the Motor Carrier Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 303, over the route for which application was made, and had so operated since that time.

The Commission denied the applications. The complainants filed separate suits in *468the District Court to set aside the orders of the Commission. The cases were heard by a Court composed of three judges under the Motor Carrier Act, 49…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. O'MALLEY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
  3. Lubetich v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1941
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API