Legal Opinion

Conklin v. BD. TRUSTEES POLICE & FIRE. RET. SYST

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

135 N.J. Super. 131 (1975)

342 A.2d 872

WILLIAM W. CONKLIN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM DIVISION OF PENSIONS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WILLIAM W. CONKLIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

CITY OF EAST ORANGE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 16, 1975.

Decided July 1, 1975.

Before Judges COLLESTER, LORA and HANDLER.

Mr. Richard Newman argued for petitioner-appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. Halpern, Deputy Attorney General, argued for respondent-respondent (Mr.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mimkon v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Hillman v. Bd. of Trust., Pub. Emp. Ret. Sys.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Singleton v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. In Re Application of Howard SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  5. Flynn v. Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conklin v. City of East OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Cattani v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, POLICE & FIREMEN'S RETIRE.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API