Legal Opinion

Tinney & Associates, Inc. v. Parham

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 13, 1991No. 2900428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Judge.

This is the second time that this workmen’s compensation case has been before this court. On August 30, 1990, Tinney & Associates, Inc., (employer) appealed from an order of the trial court which entered a judgment in favor of Opal Parham (employee). Thereafter, this court reversed and remanded the case with instructions for the trial court to ascertain whether the employee had sustained a loss of ability to earn. See Tinney & Associates, Inc., v. Parham, 579 So.2d 639 (Ala.Civ.App.1991). On remand, the trial court entered an order finding that the employee had sustained a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Lokey v. STATE DEPT. OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  3. Tinney & Associates, Inc. v. ParhamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of HooverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, LLC v. PurserCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API