Legal Opinion

Lokey v. STATE DEPT. OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1988No. Civ. 6183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this unemployment compensation case, the employee has appealed from an adverse final judgment of the trial court which was rendered after an ore tenus trial.

The employee contends that there is no dispute in the evidence. On the other hand, the Department of Industrial Relations contends that the evidence conflicted. The record does not contain a transcript of the evidence. When the evidence which was presented to the trial court is not before an appellate court, it must be conclusively presumed by the appellate court that the missing evidence is sufficient to support the final judgment,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ALABAMA a & M UNIVERSITYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Seidler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Simmons v. SimmonsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of HooverCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Tinney & Associates, Inc. v. ParhamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Boswell v. ObertCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Wilkerson v. DeatonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API