Legal Opinion

Ak-Chin Indian Community v. Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 14, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00489Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ak-Chin Indian Community, No. CV-20-00489-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 At issue is Defendant Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage District’s 17 (“MSIDD”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11, “MSIDD Mot.”) and Defendant Central Arizona 18 Irrigation & Drainage District’s (“CAIDD”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12, “CAIDD Mot.”). 19 Plaintiff filed a combined Response (Doc. 17, “Resp.”) and each Defendant filed its own 20 Reply…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Orff v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API