Legal Opinion
State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 2, 1995No. 1 CA-CR 93-0057, 1 CA-CR 93-0109 and 1 CA-CR 93-0362PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
In February 1991 a grand jury in Marico-pa County indicted twenty-one persons, most of whom were legislators or lobbyists, for criminal conduct that was captured on audio and video tape during a sting operation known as “Azscam.” Two defendants went to trial: State Senator Carolyn A. Walker and lobbyist Ronald G. Tapp. Their trial began in April and concluded in November 1992. Walker was tried on ten felony counts and was found guilty of two, filing a false campaign contribution statement and conspiracy. Tapp was tried on twenty-three felony counts and was found guilty of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Agan v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State of Arizona v. Craig A. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.