Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Cambridge Taxi Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 1, 1945PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The first action is for personal injury. The second action is by the husband of the plaintiff in the first action to recover consequential damages. The trial judge directed verdicts for the defendant.
The accident occurred on August 1, 1942, shortly after midnight. The plaintiff in the first action, hereinafter called the plaintiff, and her husband, together with a man named Tucker and his wife, were entering a taxicab operated by an agent of the defendant at Central Square in Cambridge. The plaintiff testified to this effect: The party of four approached the cab from its left side. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Finnegan v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Bannister v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Adduci v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Perkins v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Intriligator v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greenfield v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Samuels v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Marengo v. RoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- David Goldman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Tibbetts v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.