O'Neill v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from Special Term, Kings County. Action by Rose Ann O’Neill against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From an order denying its motion for a bill of particulars, defendant appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtGoodrich, P. J.
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries alleged, to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The latter appeals from an order denying its motion for a bill of particulars as to the injuries which the plaintiff alleged that she believed were permanent, and as to the length of time during which plaintiff was confined to her home. Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 70 App. Div. 1, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1107, and Curtin v. Same, 65 App. Div. 610, 72 N. Y. Supp. 580, are authority that under a similar complaint the defendant is entitled to a bill of particulars specifying…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Steinau v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Cavanagh v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. Chattanooga Iron WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1915