Legal Opinion

Steinau v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Anna Steinau, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of March, 1901, granting the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars. ■

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, «L:

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries, the complaint alleging that the plaintiff was injured by one of the cars of the defendant, the defendant’s agent not giving her sufficient time to board the car ; that the plaintiff was thrown to the street and seriously injured, and was obliged to and did incur great expense for medical and surgical attendance, appliances and medicines. The order required the plaintiff to give a bill of particulars specifying the number of the defendant’s car and the direction in *127which it was and had been moving, and the name and numbers…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Ziadi v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Desimone v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. English v. Westchester Electric Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. O'Neill v. Interurban Street RailwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API