Legal Opinion
In re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 9, 2013No. MDL Civ. No. 12-2358-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM: OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 19, 2012, four named plaintiffs (“plaintiffs”) filed a consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”) in this multidistrict consolidated litigation against Google Inc. (“Google”), Vibrant Media, Inc. (“Vibrant”), Media Innovation Group LLC (“Media”), and WPP, pic (“WPP”), (collectively “defendants”), as well as PointRoll, Inc.1 (D.I.46) On July 23, 2013, plaintiffs settled with PointRoll, Inc. (D.I.109) Plaintiffs allege that defendants “tricked” their Apple Safari (“Safari”) and/or Internet Explorer (“IE”) browsers into accepting…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- In re Facebook Internet Tracking LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021