Legal Opinion
Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 10, 2014No. Case Nos. 2:13-CV-118, 2:13-cv-257PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
Mohammad S. Galaria and Anthony Hancox (“Named Plaintiffs”) are the named plaintiffs in these related putative class action lawsuits. Named Plaintiffs sue Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), negligence, invasion of privacy, and bailment. Defendant moves to dismiss both Complaints for lack of standing and failure to state a claim.1 Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 21. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant’s motion.
I. FACTS
The following facts are taken from Named…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In Re: Science Applications International Corp. (Saic) Backup Tape Data Theft LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Khan v. Children's National Health SystemDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- McKenzie v. Allconnect, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.