Legal Opinion

Paulus v. Latta

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1884No. 9024PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— This was a suit by the appellee, a married woman, to charge her husband, as her trustee, and to correct a misdescription of land, and to quiet her title thereto against a mortgage made by her trustee to secure his own debt.

Certain judgment creditors of the husband were made co-defendants on their own petition, and they filed answers.

Daniel Paulus, the mortgagee, demurred to the complaint, for want of facts, etc. His demurrer was overruled.

The husband and all the adult defendants, concerned in the misdescription only, were defaulted.

There was a trial by jury upon complaint,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. May v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Malady v. McEnaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. McCormack v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Taylor v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Leary v. ShafferIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Trentman v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. GrahamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Pressley v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Hyland v. MilnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API