Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Moser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 2002No. 15-98-18132; A114448PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, P. J.

Approximately one year after the parties’ marriage was dissolved, husband sought to terminate his obligation to pay his former wife spousal support. The trial court reduced but did not terminate that obligation. Husband appeals, arguing that spousal support should have been terminated because wife has more income available following her remarriage than was available after their marriage was dissolved. We agree with husband, reverse the trial court’s order, and remand.

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1999. At the time of the dissolution, husband was an emergency room physician earning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of RubeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. In re the Marriage of WeberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. In re the Marriage of HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BoniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. In re the Marriage of McArdleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. In re the Marriage of HarlessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. In re the Marriage of FletcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API