City of Aurora v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Quinn
The City of Aurora appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming the Public Utilities Commission’s adoption of a rule establishing a “gross embedded investment” methodology for calculating a utility construction allowance applicable to the service extension facilities for new electric utility customers. 1 The district court held that the Public Utility Commission regularly pursued its authority in adopting the rule, that its decision was just and' reasonable and in accord with the evidence, and that the new rule would not require the city to make a donation to a public utility…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Lyman v. Town of Bow MarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Citizens for Free Enterprise v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Colorado Ground Water Commission v. Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- City and County of Denver v. Qwest Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Eddie's Leaf Spring Shop & Towing, LLC v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.