In Re Valenti
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ABBE, J.
In this petition we consider whether a person who is convicted of multiple misdemeanor offenses has the right to have the sentence for each consecutive charge conform to the limitations specified in the Penal Code for sentences on consecutive felonies.
On January 18, 1983, appellant was found guilty by a jury of three counts of violating the Aeronautics Act. (Pub. Util. Code, §§ 21403, subd. (a), 21407, and 21409.) On February 9, 1983, the trial court found petitioner to be in violation of probation. Valenti was then sentenced on the following misdemeanor matters: (1) case…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. ErdelenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. ReneeMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HibbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.