Abdullah v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
habitual offender enhancement. Bilal Abdullah appeals his conviction on one count of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon and his Among other things, Abdullah contends that the trial court erred when it relied on an abstract of judgment lacking a judicial signature as support for its findings that Abdul-lah is a serious violent felon and a habitual offender. We agree with Abdullah on this point, and we hold that where an abstract of judgment is the only evidence before the court introduced to show that an offender has a prior conviction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Johnson v. CornettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rhone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- James v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Dexter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Adam Horton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Joseph M. Backenstoes v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Justin Deon Coates v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.