Dandridge v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
1. “A ground of a motion for new trial which in order to be understood requires a consideration of the evidence must either set forth the evidence relied upon or point out where in the record such evidence may be found.” Valdosta Coca-Cola Bottling Works, Inc. v. Montgomery, 102 Ga. App. 440 (2) (116 SE2d 675). Ordinarily it is error to admit in evidence over objection an indictment against the defendant for another offense upon which there has been neither an acquittal nor a conviction, even though it might otherwise be admissible as an exception to the “other transactions”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Macon Railway & Light Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- White v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Benefield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.