Legal Opinion

Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 17, 1967No. C.D. 3058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

This protest covers certain merchandise imported from England in March 1961. The involved material was invoiced as “Empicol TSL.” It was classified under paragraph 2 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T;D. 52739, as a triethanolamine salt and was assessed compound duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem plus 3 cents per pound. A tax was also imposed against the merchandise under the Internal Revenue Act, but that levy is not under protest.

The plaintiff claims the imported product properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Calhoun, Robbins & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. International Paint Co. (Calif.), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API