Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
This protest covers certain merchandise imported from England in March 1961. The involved material was invoiced as “Empicol TSL.” It was classified under paragraph 2 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T;D. 52739, as a triethanolamine salt and was assessed compound duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem plus 3 cents per pound. A tax was also imposed against the merchandise under the Internal Revenue Act, but that levy is not under protest.
The plaintiff claims the imported product properly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
- Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Calhoun, Robbins & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- International Paint Co. (Calif.), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970