Legal Opinion

Eisenhart v. McGarry

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1900No. 1770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

William Hamilton brought a replevin suit in El Paso county, in May, 1896, against E. C. Dixon, to recover certain personal property. Therein as required by statute, and in conformity with its terms, he filed an undertaking in the sum of $3,000 which was double the alleged value of the property stated in the affidavit, which contained several conditions, one for the prosecution of the action without delay, another for the return of the property if the return was adjudged, and a third for a payment to the defendant of whatever sum of money might be recovered against him. This bond was signed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. SargentColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Davidson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. McCarthy v. StraitColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Denver Truck Exchange, Inc. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. White Automobile Co. v. HamiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Fergus Motor Co. v. SchottMontana Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API