Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Personal Restraint of McWilliams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2014No. 88883-3Published

1DissentGordon McCloud, J.

¶10 (dissenting) — I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in sentencing Dante McWilliams to a combined term of imprisonment and community custody that exceeded the statutory maximum and that McWilliams is therefore entitled to relief. But I disagree that this relief is limited to remand for the addition of a Brooks5 notation. Instead, I believe that McWilliams is entitled to a full resentencing. I therefore respectfully dissent.

ANALYSIS

¶11 Not every error in a judgment and sentence necessitates a full resentencing — some errors can be corrected through remand for a “ministerial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. RamosWashington Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API