Legal Opinion

Folz v. Wagner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1900No. 3,276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Erom the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Appellant’s demurrer for want of sufficient facts addressed to the appellee’s entire complaint consisting of two paragraphs was overruled. In each paragraph the appellee sought damages for breach of marriage contract. Each paragraph contained an averment that, on, etc., “the plaintiff then being unmarried, and over the age of eighteen years, the said defendant, in consideration of the agreement and promise of the plaintiff to marry him on request, promised and agreed to marry this plaintiff.” The first paragraph, among its averments, shows that the appellee, confiding in said promise and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. LaymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. King v. KerseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Kurtz v. FrankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Graham v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hunter v. HatfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaker v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API