Legal Opinion

McKissack v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1937No. A-9133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, for convenience referred to as the defendant, was by information charged with the larceny of one mule; was tried, convicted, and sentenced to- serve five years in the state penitentiary. From the judgment and sentence the defendant appeals, and alleges eleven errors committed in the trial of his case. The eleventh assignment being:

“That said court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial, and particularly on the ground of newly discovered evidence as set out in plaintiff in error’s amended motion for a new trial.”

This assignment covers all…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Mayse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API