McKissack v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, P. J.
The plaintiff in error, for convenience referred to as the defendant, was by information charged with the larceny of one mule; was tried, convicted, and sentenced to- serve five years in the state penitentiary. From the judgment and sentence the defendant appeals, and alleges eleven errors committed in the trial of his case. The eleventh assignment being:
“That said court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for a new trial, and particularly on the ground of newly discovered evidence as set out in plaintiff in error’s amended motion for a new trial.”
This assignment covers all…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Mayse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Choate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- England v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943