Zuniga v. State

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information filed in the district court of Tulsa county with the crime of rape, second degree, was tried before a jury, convicted, and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 14 years. Appeal has been duly perfected to this court.

For reversal, counsel set out five propositions:

“I. The court erred in refusing to grant defendant a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

“II. The verdict and sentence are not supported by the evidence.

“III. The court erred in admitting…