Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Belleque

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 2014No. 99C15857; A140461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated murder and sentenced to death. He sought post-conviction relief challenging his conviction and sentence on a number of grounds, which the post-conviction court denied. He appeals the resulting judgment, contending that the post-conviction court erred in rejecting his claims that his trial and appellate counsel provided him with constitutionally deficient representation in the guilt and penalty phases of his trial and on appeal. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

I. THE UNDERLYING CRIMES

We begin with the facts of the underlying crimes, as taken…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Mellerio v. NoothMalheur County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. Thompson v. FhuereOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Farmer v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API