Farmer v. Premo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentOrtega, J.
I agree with most of the majority’s decision in this post-conviction case. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the post-conviction court erred when it concluded that petitioner received inadequate assistance of counsel because his trial counsel “failed to call * * * Franklin Wong *** as an expert witness to testify that a handgun * * * found in the possession of * * * Baines, was more likely than not the firearm that discharged the bullet found in the deceased.” The post-conviction court granted relief after concluding that “a reasonable attorney would have called Wong *771to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hinton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Gorham v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.