Mellerio v. Nooth
Malheur County Circuit Court, Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
HASELTON, S. J.
Petitioner appeals a judgment denying post-conviction relief. ORS 138.650. He contends, inter alia, that the post-conviction court erred in rejecting his claim of constitutionally inadequate representation based on criminal trial counsel’s failure to request a “Boots” jury concurrence instruction1 relating to four counts of coercion, ORS 163.275, on which he was convicted. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that: (1) with respect to two of the coercion counts (Counts 5 and 6), a jury concurrence instruction would have been inapposite, rendering counsel’s performance…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. TheriaultCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. TeaguesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. SlaviakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Wilson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.