Legal Opinion

Mellerio v. Nooth

Malheur County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided July 7, 2016No. 12029285P; A153539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASELTON, S. J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying post-conviction relief. ORS 138.650. He contends, inter alia, that the post-conviction court erred in rejecting his claim of constitutionally inadequate representation based on criminal trial counsel’s failure to request a “Boots” jury concurrence instruction1 relating to four counts of coercion, ORS 163.275, on which he was convicted. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that: (1) with respect to two of the coercion counts (Counts 5 and 6), a jury concurrence instruction would have been inapposite, rendering counsel’s performance…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. TheriaultCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. TeaguesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. SlaviakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Wilson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API