Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Loo Sing

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1921No. 12605PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trover; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. May 18, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

This was an action in trover, brought by the owner of a suit of clothes, of the value of $20, to recover possession of the clothes, which he had delivered to the defendant for the purpose of being cleaned and pressed. When the owner demanded the clothes the defendant refused to deliver them, denying that he had them or that the plaintiff had ever delivered them to him. Thereupon the owner filed his suit in trover, and subsequently, one day after the service of the suit, the clothes were put by some unknown person upon the plaintiff’s porch and he recovered them in good condition. The fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Lightsey v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Spiers v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Woodruff Machinery Manufacturing Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Fisk Rubber Co. of New York v. Lawer Auto SupplyWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API