Legal Opinion
Turner v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 23, 1923No. 13626PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. A certificate of corporate stock is not -a negotiable instrument. East Birmingham Land Co. v. Dennis, 85 Ala. 565 (5 So. 317, 2 L. R. A. 836 (2); 7 Am. St. R. 73); Hammond v. Hastings, 134, U. S. 401 (5) (10 Sup. Ct. 727, 33 L. ed. 960); National Safety Deposit Co. v. Hibbs, 229 U. S. 391 (33 Sup. 818, 57 L. ed. 1241); 2 Cook on Corporations (6th ed.), 412.
*752Decided February 23, 1923. Jordan & Moore, for plaintiff. Brock, Sparks S Russell, for defendants.
2. Where the owner of a stock-certificate entrusts it, for a specific purpose, to a person who, departing from his trust, pledges the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Ansley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- East Birmingham Land Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Cohen v. PraterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bromley v. BromleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Groover v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Cobb Exchange Bank v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Nikas v. HindleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Lilly v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.