Spiers v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Trover; from city court of Elberton—Judge Grogan. January 11, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.
Hubbard sold to Spiers a number of articles of machinery, comprising a part of a laundry outfit, and took from Spiers a series of promissory notes for the purchase-price, maturing at different dates, in each of which it was stipulated that title to the property sold was retained in the vendor until payment of the note. There was no provision therein giving the seller the right to declare the whole debt due on default in payment of a part of the purchase-price. The notes were for $150 each. Spiers paid $100 on the first note, and, after the maturity of the second note and default in payment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Liptrot v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
- Jordan v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Rushin v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Farkas v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Insurance v. WelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Stanfield v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Pierce v. Loo SingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Maryland Casualty Insurance v. WelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.