Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Plan, Inc. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1976No. 76-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal requires us to determine if the Tax Commissioner’s finding appellant’s dragline was unreasonable or unlawful.

R. C. 5711.18 provides, in part:

“* * * In the case of personal property used in business, the book value thereof less book depreciation at such time shall be listed, and such depreciated book value shall be taken as the true value of such property, unless the assessor finds that such depreciated book value is greater or less than the then true value of such property in money.

Appellant contends that because Big Muskie produced approximately one-third of its expected output…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equilease Corp. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gahanna Heights, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Syro Steel Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. CC Leasing Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API