Legal Opinion
State v. Druke
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 30, 1984No. 2 CA-SA 0134PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
This special action was taken from the order of the respondent court denying the state/petitioner’s motion to appoint a mental health expert to examine the defendant/real party in interest pursuant to Rule 11.2, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S. and A.R.S. § 13-3993. We accept jurisdiction because the question presented is a matter of first impression in this state and is of statewide importance, and because the petitioner has no adequate remedy by appeal. See State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 138 Ariz. 500, 675 P.2d 1319 (1984);…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HallmanArizona Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kansas v. CheeverSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. GrellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Hartless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.