Legal Opinion
Dubinsky v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 31, 1999No. 98-884CPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a bid protest action challenging a procurement by the United States Air Force (“USAF”). Nu-Way Signs Company (“Nu-Way”), of which Meir Dubinsky, plaintiff pro se, is the sole proprietor, submitted proposals in response to a solicitation issued by the USAF Academy (“Academy”) for two electronic scoreboards for the Academy’s football stadium in Colorado. After conducting discussions with six offerors and evaluating amended proposals, the agency awarded the contract to Daktronics, Inc. (“Daktronics”). Subsequently, plaintiff filed a protest with the General…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Caci Field Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Information Technology & Applications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.