In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995 and lists a business address in Brussels, Belgium with the Office of Court Administration. This Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in New York in 2014 due to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice arising from his failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (113 AD3d 1020, 1055 [2014]; see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]). Respondent has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In Re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-AAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Verheyden)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017