Legal Opinion
Matter of Edelstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 2017PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent is a California resident who was admitted to practice by this Court in 2008 after previously being admitted in New Jersey in 2007.
In February 2016, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months by the Supreme Court of New Jersey due to stipulated findings of fact that he had, among other misconduct, failed to properly supervise a nonlawyer employee who had misappropriated client funds and had made misrepresentations concerning his partnership in a New Jersey law firm (Matter of Edelstein, 224 NJ 31, 128 A3d 692 [2016]). Upon the motion of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3Cited by37 opinions
- Matter of SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Squires)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (Timourian)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of ShmulskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.