Legal Opinion

Weiman v. Butterman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1970No. Gen. 53,752PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

This is an action based on a written agreement under which plaintiff installed coin-operated washers and dryers in the laundry room of an apartment building. Defendant subsequently purchased the building and plaintiff’s machines, after being disconnected, were displaced by similar machines installed by another company. Plaintiff contended the original agreement was a lease, and defendant asserted the agreement was a license. In a non-jury trial, the court found for plaintiff and judgment was entered for $2,775.

On appeal defendant contends (1) that the agreement was a mere license and not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Lakeside Galleries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Mueller v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Wash-O-Matic Laundry Co. v. 621 Lefferts Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kaypar Corp. v. Fosterport Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Mack v. McIntoshIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corporation v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dana Point Condominium Ass'n v. Keystone Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. People v. Chicago Metro Car Rentals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. United Coin Meter Co v. GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Fox v. Commercial Coin Laundry SystemsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API