Legal Opinion

Richards v. Griffith

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1891No. 14096PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The court below sustained the demurrer to the complaint, and plaintiff having declined to amend, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants.

It is alleged in the complaint that on November 11, 1884, defendant Bunnel made and delivered to Charles St. Sure a promissory note for the sum of $700, payable November 11, 1886, and to secure payment thereof executed and delivered to him a mortgage on certain lands, which are described; that on August 25, 1886, the defendants Griffith & Stose recovered and caused to be docketed a judgment against said Bunnel for the sum of $303.26; that on October…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bunn v. LindsaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Persons v. ShaefferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Federal Land Bank v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API