People v. Heideman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a destructive device in a “specified place” (Pen. Code, § 12303.2). He contends that: l) the judgment was void on its face; 2) the court erred in instructing the jury as to the elements of Penal Code section 12303.2 and refusing his proffered instructions; 3) there was no evidence that he possessed a destructive device as he did not have the blasting caps. necessary to set off the dynamite; 4) the destruction of the dynamite by the police for reasons of public safety violated…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. TurnageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. MastenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.