Legal Opinion

People v. Heideman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1976No. Crim. 14642PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a destructive device in a “specified place” (Pen. Code, § 12303.2). He contends that: l) the judgment was void on its face; 2) the court erred in instructing the jury as to the elements of Penal Code section 12303.2 and refusing his proffered instructions; 3) there was no evidence that he possessed a destructive device as he did not have the blasting caps. necessary to set off the dynamite; 4) the destruction of the dynamite by the police for reasons of public safety violated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. TurnageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. MastenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API