Legal Opinion

County of Pocahontas v. Katz-Craig Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Pocahontas District Court. — D. F. Coyle, Judge. Action to recover an alleged overpayment on a contract for the excavation of a drainage ditch. Verdict for the plaintiff by direction of the court, for the full amount claimed. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

1. Contracts : construction: ambiguous conlract : pviolence to aid construction. I. On April 8, 1908, the board of supervisors of Pocahontas County entered into a contract with defendants for the construction and excavation of a drainage ditch in Drainage District No. 29 in .said county, for an agreed consideration of $31,700. On January 31, 1910, after a portion of the work covered by said contract had been performed by the defendant, it developed that certain changes and alterations were neces*1315sary in some of the ditches to be dug as a part of said drainage system, and the original contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Field v. Eastern Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Heath v. AlbrookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Humboldt County v. Ward Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Cedar Rapids National Bank v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. City of Des Moines v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Central Trust Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Independent School District No. 6 v. MittryIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Brecht v. Cedar Rapids Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API