Legal Opinion
Chengfan Hsu v. Philippine Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 3, 1951No. 30474PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an alien resident of the United States who is attending school in the Eastern section of the country, seeks to recover damages from defendant Philippine Air Lines, Inc. for its part in contributing to her confinement in the immigration quarters for a period of one month upon her arrival in the United States.
Plaintiff alleges several causes of action against defendant, but the gravamen is that defendant failed to obtain proper entry papers for plaintiff from the British Consulate at Hongkong.
Defendant has moved to quash .service of summons and has also moved…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Robert Mitchell Furniture Co. v. Selden Breck Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Garvin v. Alumax of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Sweeney v. AbramovitzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
- Agosto v. BarceloDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1984
- Garvin v. Alumax Of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Food for Pets v. Just for PetsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996