Legal Opinion
Food for Pets v. Just for Pets
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 13, 1996No. CV-95-470-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Food for Pets v. Just for Pets CV-95-470-M 12/13/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD FOR PETS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 95-470-M JUST FOR PETS SUPERSTORES, INC., Defendant. O R D E R Plaintiff, Food For Pets, Inc., alleges that defendant. Just For Pets Superstores, Inc., has violated its rights protected by the Lanham Act (Count I), the New Hampshire State Trademark Act (Count II), the common law of unfair competition (Count III), and the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act (Count IV). Before the court is defendant's motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.