Commonwealth v. Tyson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtOlszewski, J.
¶ 1 Mark Bowden and Linn Washington, Jr. appeal from the December 13, 2000, order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. This order held appellants in contempt for failing to comply with the court’s December 4, 2000, order, which required them to produce a defendant’s verbatim statements prior to his criminal trial. As a result, the court ordered them to “pay $100 per minute starting 12:00 noon [on December 13, 2000] until compliance or until the Commonwealth finally rests its case on rebuttal.” Order, 12/13/00. After thorough review, we affirm.
¶ 2 The two orders issued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bruno & Stillman, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002